The Purdue Life Sciences
Business Plan Competition
By Mike Lillich
Don Blewett (MBA '02), associate director
for the Burton D. Morgan Center for Entrepreneurship in Discovery Park, just
might be pondering ideas for next year's competition as he watches the presentations. |
Take
a technological medical application, add a dash of entrepreneurism, and you
have the makings of an entry to the Purdue Life Sciences Business Plan Competition.
But you'd better have all your molecules in a row, because with $147,000
in prizes at stake - including $100,000 from founding partner Roche Diagnostics
- these scientists mean business.
Walking the talk
They can spot and correct
your eye disease, create a medical technology database that allows speech
recognition, label molecules for gene profiling, prevent the onset of high
blood pressure, treat multiple sclerosis, ensure the purity and low cost
of your pharmaceuticals, and identify live bacteria to prevent the wrong
critters from getting into the wrong places.
They're life sciences
entrepreneurs, armed to the teeth with data, technology, and expertise. They're
just looking for the right backing to make it all happen. Last April, they
came to Purdue to get that backing - but they had to fight for it. Eight
finalists, narrowed down from an original number of 46 business plan entrants,
competed for only one first-place prize: $50,000 in cash, and $10,000 in
legal and business services.
That prize was part of
the $147,000 in total prize winnings offered during the inaugural Purdue
University Life Sciences Business Plan Competition, held in the North Ballroom
of the Memorial Student Union on April 23.
The hefty purse attracted
52 entrants from all over the nation - California, New York, Florida, Georgia,
and Indiana - and yielded 46 complete business plans based on solid life
sciences research at top research universities. Roche Diagnostics Corporation,
the founding sponsor for the life sciences competition, put up $100,000 in
prize money.
Getting
serious
The eight finalists, who were selected by the
10 judges, were start-up enterprises at various rungs of the commercialization
ladder. The finalists came to Purdue to give venture-capitalist-style pitches
in front of the judges.
This was one of the first demonstrations of how
Discovery Park, the multidisciplinary research center at Purdue, will work
to encourage collaborative projects. Discovery Park is the outcome of Purdue
President Martin Jischke's vision that the twenty-first century university
must not only do basic research but also provide the entrepreneurial know-how
to bring products to market.
The world, Jischke says, no longer splits neatly
along an axis of public and private sectors. The future belongs to those
universities and their states that combine public and private applications
most creatively and nimbly. Purdue is taking a leadership role in that effort
in Indiana. The Burton D. Morgan Center for Entrepreneurship, for which Krannert
Dean and Leeds Professor of Management Richard Cosier is the director, will
play a key role in helping those new applications and scientific breakthroughsget
off the ground.
"We want this to be the best life sciences
business plan competition in the world," Cosier says. "It will
highlight the state of Indiana as a key location for life sciences activities."
With such a lofty goal and Discovery Park's focus
on cutting-edge research and marketing, there was no room for dabblers, especially
in a national entrepreneurial competition.
"There weren't any entrants with silk-screen
genome T-shirts," says Don Blewett (MBA '02), associate director for
the Burton Morgan Center, and the event coordinator. "This was serious
technology, competing for serious money."
Logan Jordan, a competition judge and Krannert
School associate dean, agrees. "This was clearly a national event," he
says. "There was stiff competition, and that's exactly what we need
if we're serious about nurturing the ideas that come out of Purdue research
and making them a source of economic development."
The
winners' lineup
1.
Iris AO University of Rochester and the University of California, Berkeley
Has developed SmartMirror technology for early detection of eye disease
and the potential to correct vision to 20/10. $50,000 cash, $10,000
in legal and business services
2.
Medical Reporting Solutions Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
Uses automatic speech-recognition technology for medical technology
databases. $20,000 second prize, plus another $20,000 for being the
top Indiana entry, and $8,000 in legal and business services
3.
NanoString Technologies University of Washington in Seattle Uses a
probe to label unique molecules for gene profiling. $15,000 plus $6,000
in legal and business services
4.
Hypogen University of Virginia in Charlottesville Has developed a diagnostic
test that may prevent the onset of high blood pressure in humans. $7,500
5.
Iterative Therapeutics University of Chicago Has developed a product
for the treatment of multiple sclerosis that also has potential for
treating other diseases. $5,000
6.
Monocle Technologies Purdue University Designs process-monitoring equipment
to oversee purity and find defects in individual tablets as they are
produced on pharmaceutical companies' high-speed pill presses. $2,500
Finalists
($1,500 each) BioVitesse Purdue University Employs technology that
identifies live bacteria quickly for quality-control applications in
the microbiology industry.
VersaChrome
Purdue University Uses simulated moving-bed technology to increase
purity and reduce costs in producing pharmaceuticals and biochemicals.

Holding
the winner's check are (from left)
Martin Madaus, president and CEO of Roche Diagnostics; Rick Cosier,
Krannert dean and Leeds Professor of Management, and director of
the Burton D. Morgan Center for Entrepreneurship; and Matthew Campbell,
chief operating officer for Iris AO, the competition winner. |
What's the big idea?
The idea for a life sciences
business plan competition began at a lunch, with plans at least figuratively
sketched on the proverbial paper napkin. Present were Blewett; Cosier; Mike
Fitzgerald, Roche Diagnostics' director of business development; and John
Aplin, a member of the Krannert Dean's Advisory Council and managing partner
of the Indianapolis office of CID Equity Partners, a venture capital company.
"Roche was intrigued
with our Burton D. Morgan Entrepreneurship Competition, where Purdue students
and staff pitch their ideas for start-up funding for their fledgling enterprises," says
Cosier. "So their thought was to build something more focused on the
life sciences that would jump-start both companies and technologies."
As Roche's Fitzgerald
explains, "While a company like ours needs access to new ideas, with
general business plan competitions, we have to sift through so many proposals
that aren't relevant or applicable to our industry that it made it difficult
to get engaged." Fitzgerald says Aplin related that in the venture community,
there tend to be more industry-specific conferences. "And the conversation
and the concept just evolved from there," Fitzgerald says. "It
became a very productive business luncheon."
Subsequently, Roche Diagnostics
became the founding sponsor, contributing $100,000 to the competition.
"This is new for
Roche," Fitzgerald says. "We had never done anything at that level
of cooperation with another entity before. But the number and quality of
the entries exceeded our expectations. At the competition on Purdue's campus,
we saw eight high-quality life sciences business opportunities, six of which
we would not have known about."
Fitzgerald says Roche
Diagnostics has had conversations with "at least three of the finalists," but
cautions that the medical device and pharmaceutical industries are always
looking for new ideas and technologies, and conversations don't necessarily
mean that acquisition of companies or technologies is imminent. But Roche
is convinced from its first year of sponsorship that the company will sponsor
next year's competition.
"We're looking forward
to having time on our side next year," Fitzgerald says. "We were
working on a short time schedule this year, and we may have missed some entrants.
We've already started planning meetings for 2004."
Fitzgerald says it may
be possible to expand the competition next year and include other pharmaceutical,
biotech, or other life science companies and initiatives. However, while
the competition may grow, its roots are planted firmly in Indiana.
"We want to be open
to the best entrants and ideas from around the world," Fitzgerald says. "That
said, we like partnering with a world-renowned Indiana school. After all,
Indiana is where the bulk of our 3,500 employees live and work.
"Here in Indiana
we're not going to be the next Boston or San Diego," he says. "But
Indiana can be a significant force in the life sciences. We have great resources
- in addition to Roche, there is Eli Lilly & Company, Guidant Corporation,
and Dow Chemical. We have two tremendous universities, and we have Indianapolis.
"It's critical
that, as thought leaders, we collaborate and 'connect the dots,' " he
adds. "Indiana can be a significant player in the life sciences - not
in every area, certainly, but we can pick our spots and be world-class in
some areas."
In order to stimulate
interest from within Indiana, the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership and
the Indiana Health Industry Forum each added $10,000 in prize money for the
top-finishing Indiana team. Indianapolis-based law firm Baker & Daniels
and its health technologies consulting affiliate, Aventor, contributed $10,000
to support the competition and $12,000 in services to the top three finishers.
Clifton Gunderson LLP, a national accounting firm with an office in Indianapolis,
contributed $5,000 to support the competition and $12,000 in services to
the top three finishers. Therefore, an Indiana team winning the competition
would receive an impressive $80,000 in prize money.
The pitches
Finalists made 20-minute venture-capitalist-style
presentations and then fielded 25 minutes of questions from the judges. Judges'
queries ranged from basic science questions to predictions on the state of
company management three years out.
Jordan says the judges evaluated teams on the
strength of their technologies, the potential market size, their time to
market, their probability of success, the management team, and the amount
of capital needed.
"Almost every plan had someone on the judges'
panel who didn't like it," Jordan says. "So we threw out the high
and low scores."
This led to what another judge, David Denis, Burton
D. Morgan Chair of Private Enterprise, terms "a degree of consensus
that surprised me. There was even a strong correlation between the preliminary
rankings we did before the presentations and the final scores."
And the winner is …
Iris AO, a start-up company formed by principals
from the University of Rochester (New York) and the University of California,
Berkeley, won the $50,000 first prize. Using the same optical technology
as that in the Hubble telescope, the company has developed an application
called SmartMirror, which allows early detection of eye diseases and has
the potential to correct vision to 20/10. In addition to the first prize,
Iris AO won $10,000 in legal and business services.
Matthew Campbell, chief operating officer of Iris
AO, ended his presentation to the 10-judge panel by saying: "Our goal
is to build our reputation as a world-class optical company. We're at the
stage where we have some customers, and we'd like to go out and hire more
people. The prize money will help us do that."
Two months after the competition, Campbell described
his team's win as "perfect timing. The $50,000 has gotten us over the
hump. We've made a number of contacts with significant companies. We're hiring
five PhDs, and we've been written up on smalltimes.com, which everybody in
our industry reads."
Second place went to Medical Reporting Solutions,
from Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. The company has developed
automatic speech-recognition technology for medical technology databases.
Medical Reporting Solutions won the $20,000 second prize plus another $20,000
as the top Indiana entry. The team also won $8,000 in legal and business
services.
NanoString Technologies, from the University of
Washington in Seattle, which uses a probe to label unique molecules for gene
profiling, took third place and won $15,000 plus $6,000 in legal and business
services.
The next step
The expectations for life science startups are
high, both on the Purdue campus and in the state. And lessons for both came
out of the competition.
"This is not just about Purdue," Jordan
says. "The top finishers all came out of universities with medical schools.
So, here at Purdue, we can do life sciences problem recognition, drug development,
and animal trials through our veterinary school. But if you want to migrate
from idea to solution to business, somewhere the road will take you through
a med school."
At this writing, the steel beams of the superstructure
are in place for the Burton D. Morgan Center for Entrepreneurship on the
west side of campus. The center is the first structure going up in Discovery
Park; other buildings will include the Bindley Bioscience Center and the
Birck Nanotechnology Center. The entrepreneurship center will provide the
entrepreneurial support to turn Purdue professors' high-level scientific
research into products and prosperity.
With the entrepreneurship center's first success
under his belt, Blewett can afford to reflect and philosophize a bit before
starting to put next year's competition together. It's perhaps no surprise
that he's looking at the big picture, and how the competition will affect
more than just the competitors.
"The competition was a vehicle to engage
both public and private sectors," he says. "And for the state of
Indiana, it could be one of the answers to the state's search for jobs and
economic development."
A Purdue engineering grad, Blewett was an entrepreneur
himself before returning to Krannert to get his MBA at an age when most people
are slowing down, not starting up. He doesn't have any romantic notions about
entrepreneurship.
"Entrepreneurship is not mysterious, unique,
or brand new," he says. "It's creatively and aggressively applying
standard business principles and making decisions quickly for the right reasons.
It's saying what you're going to do and doing what you say.
"You can get most ideas to fly. It's just
a question of how high. It's lemonade stands and the thought processes you
go through in a startup. Entrepreneurship is the real-life application of
business principles, which is what we saw in the life sciences business-plan
competition."
Blewett says he's ready for next year.
"This competition was our center for entrepreneurship's
successful startup," he says. "We were working on a short timeframe,
but we did it well. We're going to do it again, and we're going to do it
better."
The 2004 Purdue University Life Sciences Business
Plan Competition will be held April 20-21. Executive summaries are due by
January 5, 2004. For more information, contact Don Blewett, associate director,
Burton D. Morgan Center for Entrepreneurship, (765) 494-4485, blewett@mgmt.purdue.edu. You
will find details on the competition web site: www.purdue.edu/discoverypark/lifesciencescompetition/
|